PHDG vs. HEDG
PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) and HEDG (Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds - PHDG tracks the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index while HEDG tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHDG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HEDG.
Performance
PHDG vs. HEDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than HEDG's 2.54% return.
PHDG
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
HEDG
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHDG vs. HEDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 8.98% | 1.09% |
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 2.54% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHDG and HEDG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHDG vs. HEDG — Risk / Return Rank
PHDG
HEDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PHDG vs. HEDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHDG | HEDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHDG vs. HEDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than HEDG's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and HEDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHDG | HEDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -3.85% | -13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -0.73% | -5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -0.39% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | — | — |
Volatility
PHDG vs. HEDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHDG | HEDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 5.86% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 5.86% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 5.86% | +6.25% |
PHDG vs. HEDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HEDG's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHDG vs. HEDG - Dividend Comparison
PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than HEDG's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 2.35% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 1.70% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHDG and HEDG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HEDG.
HEDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.70% for PHDG.
PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, while HEDG tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Equable Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.96% for HEDG.
Find the right allocation for PHDG and HEDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer