PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L
PHAU.AS (WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHAU.AS is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while MINV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHAU.AS returned 12.91%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for MINV.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHAU.AS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.
Performance
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PHAU.AS is traded in EUR, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHAU.AS achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PHAU.AS has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 12.91%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.84% annualized return.
PHAU.AS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
MINV.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- -0.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHAU.AS WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC | 4.61% | 45.53% | 34.03% | 9.32% | 5.55% | 3.63% | 13.51% | 20.41% | 2.85% | -1.37% |
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.91% | -2.02% | 18.30% | 3.65% | -3.99% | 23.53% | -6.42% | 26.40% | 1.89% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHAU.AS and MINV.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2012 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank
PHAU.AS
MINV.L
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHAU.AS | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.00 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.02 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | -0.05 | +4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHAU.AS | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | -0.01 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.61 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.57 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHAU.AS drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -28.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHAU.AS and MINV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHAU.AS | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.19% | -28.32% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.74% | -5.64% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -11.56% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.74% | -12.36% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.59% | -28.32% | +9.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.26% | -6.57% | -8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -4.72% | -7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 2.53% | +4.13% |
Volatility
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Physical Gold UCITS ETC (PHAU.AS) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.35%. This indicates that PHAU.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHAU.AS | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 2.35% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.12% | 5.56% | +14.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 7.95% | +15.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 10.14% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 11.92% | +2.37% |
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHAU.AS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHAU.AS vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PHAU.AS nor MINV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHAU.AS and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MINV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MINV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PHAU.AS.
PHAU.AS is categorized as Gold, while MINV.L is Global Equities. PHAU.AS tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHAU.AS and 0.35% for MINV.L.
Find the right allocation for PHAU.AS and MINV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer