PGUAX vs. RGIYX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PGUAX (Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund) and RGIYX (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PGUAX returned 7.41%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for RGIYX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGUAX charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RGIYX.

Performance

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund (PGUAX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGUAX achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than RGIYX's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PGUAX has underperformed RGIYX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while RGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.

PGUAX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 10.25%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 15.94%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 7.41%

RGIYX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.01%
• 1Y: 15.00%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGUAX Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund	10.25%	16.32%	9.06%	0.94%	-7.76%	13.58%	-0.53%	27.96%	-6.60%	17.80%
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	8.83%	20.07%	9.96%	6.94%	-2.95%	12.44%	-3.37%	27.98%	-9.87%	18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PGUAX and RGIYX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.93

The correlation between PGUAX and RGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PGUAX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGUAX

PGUAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
PGUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PGUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PGUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PGUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PGUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

RGIYX

RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 36
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund (PGUAX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGUAX	RGIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.52	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.16	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.27	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.53	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.41	8.48	-1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGUAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the RGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGUAX and RGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGUAX	RGIYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.52	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.67	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.51	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.52	-0.08

Drawdowns

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGUAX drawdown since its inception was -47.95%, which is greater than RGIYX's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGUAX and RGIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGUAX	RGIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.95%	-39.17%	-8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.78%	-6.00%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.75%	-13.74%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.20%	-20.19%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.67%	-39.17%	+0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-3.45%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.70%	-4.68%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	1.79%	+0.40%

Volatility

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund (PGUAX) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) at 3.51%. This indicates that PGUAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGUAX	RGIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	3.51%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	8.16%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.64%	10.02%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.07%	13.57%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.34%	15.93%	+0.41%

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGUAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGUAX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison

PGUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, less than RGIYX's 8.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PGUAX Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infrastructure Fund	7.99%	8.72%	5.62%	2.44%	11.03%	6.05%	2.38%	4.88%	6.33%	2.97%	4.98%	10.23%
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	8.78%	9.39%	5.64%	2.76%	3.46%	17.26%	7.80%	15.89%	9.20%	11.32%	6.70%	5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGUAX and RGIYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PGUAX and RGIYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PGUAX or RGIYX?

PGUAX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to RGIYX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGUAX dropped -47.95% vs RGIYX's -39.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.