PGTYX vs. FELIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX).
PGTYX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Dec 17, 2008. FELIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund | -8.01% | 23.31% | 27.88% | 53.82% | -32.30% | 11.72% | 70.92% | 47.50% | -6.72% | 47.05% |
FELIX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I | 0.34% | 45.25% | 44.10% | 75.49% | -34.88% | 57.89% | 44.02% | 64.21% | -12.52% | 34.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTYX achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly lower than FELIX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTYX has underperformed FELIX with an annualized return of 20.82%, while FELIX has yielded a comparatively higher 29.99% annualized return.
PGTYX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- -8.01%
- 6M
- -7.68%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.82%
FELIX
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -9.99%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 77.58%
- 3Y*
- 38.40%
- 5Y*
- 28.12%
- 10Y*
- 29.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGTYX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FELIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGTYX vs. FELIX — Risk / Return Rank
PGTYX
FELIX
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTYX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.94 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 2.55 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 4.18 | -2.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 15.94 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTYX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.94 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.75 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.40 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTYX and FELIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Dividend Comparison
PGTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, more than FELIX's 6.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund | 11.77% | 10.83% | 6.40% | 0.57% | 1.71% | 21.15% | 13.60% | 2.63% | 9.44% | 6.75% | 1.01% | 4.56% |
FELIX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I | 6.49% | 6.51% | 6.44% | 3.15% | 3.09% | 4.14% | 4.43% | 1.04% | 19.34% | 9.50% | 0.55% | 10.37% |
Drawdowns
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTYX drawdown since its inception was -42.09%, smaller than the maximum FELIX drawdown of -71.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTYX and FELIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTYX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.09% | -71.17% | +29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -17.09% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.09% | -46.02% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.09% | -46.02% | +3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.58% | -14.65% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -21.27% | +14.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.49% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PGTYX vs. FELIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) is 8.10%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class I (FELIX) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that PGTYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGTYX | FELIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 10.51% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 24.76% | -8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 39.67% | -11.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 37.96% | -13.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 34.34% | -10.47% |