PGTYX vs. FELAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX).
PGTYX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Dec 17, 2008. FELAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund | -2.29% | 23.31% | 27.88% | 53.82% | -32.30% | 11.72% | 70.92% | 47.50% | -6.72% | 47.05% |
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A | 10.24% | 44.88% | 43.74% | 75.08% | -35.07% | 57.50% | 43.57% | 63.76% | -12.76% | 34.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTYX achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTYX has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 21.55%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.86% annualized return.
PGTYX
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- 24.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 21.55%
FELAX
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 15.55%
- 1Y
- 90.94%
- 3Y*
- 42.48%
- 5Y*
- 29.37%
- 10Y*
- 30.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGTYX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FELAX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGTYX vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank
PGTYX
FELAX
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTYX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 2.33 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 2.92 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 5.54 | -2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 20.87 | -12.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTYX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.33 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.41 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTYX and FELAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison
PGTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, more than FELAX's 6.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund | 11.09% | 10.83% | 6.40% | 0.57% | 1.71% | 21.15% | 13.60% | 2.63% | 9.44% | 6.75% | 1.01% | 4.56% |
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A | 6.32% | 6.96% | 7.02% | 3.40% | 3.32% | 4.34% | 4.51% | 1.00% | 20.15% | 9.67% | 0.36% | 10.71% |
Drawdowns
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTYX drawdown since its inception was -42.09%, smaller than the maximum FELAX drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTYX and FELAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTYX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.09% | -71.33% | +29.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.58% | -14.66% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.09% | -46.15% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.09% | -46.15% | +4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -6.18% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -22.02% | +15.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 4.54% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PGTYX vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) is 9.23%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that PGTYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGTYX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 12.33% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.26% | 25.75% | -8.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 40.25% | -11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.73% | 38.06% | -13.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 34.41% | -10.50% |