PGTYX vs. DBSCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PGTYX (Putnam Global Technology Fund) and DBSCX (Doubleline Selective Credit Fund) are both mutual funds - PGTYX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Putnam, while DBSCX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, PGTYX returned 26.00%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for DBSCX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGTYX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DBSCX.

Performance

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTYX achieves a 41.96% return, which is significantly higher than DBSCX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTYX has outperformed DBSCX with an annualized return of 26.00%, while DBSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.

PGTYX

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 20.06%
• YTD: 41.96%
• 6M: 41.14%
• 1Y: 71.88%
• 3Y*: 36.94%
• 5Y*: 19.69%
• 10Y*: 26.00%

DBSCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 6.43%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund	41.96%	23.31%	27.88%	53.82%	-32.30%	11.72%	70.92%	47.50%	-6.72%	47.05%
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund	1.71%	8.46%	7.78%	8.55%	-8.10%	4.13%	1.83%	5.68%	3.03%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTYX and DBSCX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.03

Return for Risk

PGTYX vs. DBSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGTYX

PGTYX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PGTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PGTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PGTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PGTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PGTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

DBSCX

DBSCX Risk / Return Rank: 94
DBSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DBSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DBSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
DBSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) and Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGTYX	DBSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	3.27	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.99	5.07	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.77	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.45	5.11	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.39	20.66	-3.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the DBSCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTYX and DBSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGTYX	DBSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35	3.27	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	1.41	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.08	1.59	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.60	-0.63

Drawdowns

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTYX drawdown since its inception was -42.09%, which is greater than DBSCX's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTYX and DBSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGTYX	DBSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.09%	-14.12%	-27.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.58%	-1.32%	-12.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.36%	-1.91%	-26.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.09%	-9.52%	-32.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.09%	-14.12%	-27.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-0.13%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.61%	-1.24%	-5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	0.33%	+3.92%

Volatility

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) at 0.71%. This indicates that PGTYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGTYX	DBSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	0.71%	+7.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.83%	1.52%	+16.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.13%	2.06%	+20.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.99%	2.71%	+22.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.12%	2.90%	+21.22%

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTYX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than DBSCX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGTYX vs. DBSCX - Dividend Comparison

PGTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than DBSCX's 6.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund	6.57%	6.50%	7.09%	6.77%	6.67%	4.68%	4.64%	6.04%	7.43%	9.01%	9.73%	9.53%
PGTYX Putnam Global Technology Fund	7.63%	10.83%	6.40%	0.57%	1.71%	21.15%	13.60%	2.63%	9.44%	6.75%	1.01%	4.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGTYX and DBSCX in my portfolio?

PGTYX and DBSCX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGTYX or DBSCX?

PGTYX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to DBSCX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTYX dropped -42.09% vs DBSCX's -14.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.