PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGTIX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class (PGTIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTIX achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 11.27% return.


PGTIX

1D
1.73%
1M
-3.21%
6M
26.35%
YTD
27.34%
1Y
41.81%
3Y*
33.87%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.46%

GQFPX

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.83%
6M
3.53%
YTD
11.27%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PGTIX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class
27.34%27.48%33.33%56.25%-55.48%-7.43%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
11.27%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTIX and GQFPX is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.32

The correlation between PGTIX and GQFPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGTIX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGTIX
PGTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class (PGTIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGTIXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.84

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

7.22

+0.90

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTIX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTIX drawdown since its inception was -65.26%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTIX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGTIXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.26%

-16.95%

-48.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.47%

-6.28%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

-10.57%

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.26%

-16.95%

-48.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.71%

-1.75%

-9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-3.03%

-15.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

2.46%

+3.07%

Volatility

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class (PGTIX) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 2.63%. This indicates that PGTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGTIXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.32%

2.63%

+8.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.44%

8.26%

+17.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.05%

10.19%

+18.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.68%

12.78%

+19.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.31%

12.80%

+16.51%

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGTIX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

PGTIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.54%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGTIX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund I Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.27%27.92%5.04%0.07%24.92%15.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGTIX and GQFPX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGTIX has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to GQFPX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTIX dropped -65.26% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGTIX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer