PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGJZX vs. RGIYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGJZX achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than RGIYX's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJZX has outperformed RGIYX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while RGIYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.96% annualized return.


PGJZX

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.36%
6M
3.01%
YTD
7.90%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
8.75%
ALL TIME*
8.00%

RGIYX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.74%
6M
4.56%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
13.43%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
7.96%
ALL TIME*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGJZX
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund
7.90%18.41%17.13%5.85%-7.82%15.06%1.98%28.89%-8.57%18.81%
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
10.16%20.07%9.96%6.94%-2.95%12.44%-3.37%27.98%-9.87%18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PGJZX and RGIYX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.92

The correlation between PGJZX and RGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGJZX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGJZX
PGJZX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PGJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PGJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

RGIYX
RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGJZXRGIYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.49

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

7.53

-2.38

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGJZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the RGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGJZX and RGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGJZX drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum RGIYX drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJZX and RGIYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGJZXRGIYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

-39.17%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-6.00%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.51%

-10.80%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

-20.19%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

-39.17%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-2.27%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-4.65%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.98%

+0.48%

Volatility

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) at 2.18%. This indicates that PGJZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGJZXRGIYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.18%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

8.52%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

10.23%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

13.53%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

15.83%

-0.10%

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGJZX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGJZX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison

PGJZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, less than RGIYX's 8.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGJZX
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund
6.53%7.18%9.95%1.59%3.30%7.77%1.17%1.58%2.13%1.35%1.71%1.42%
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.22%9.39%5.64%2.76%3.46%17.26%7.80%15.89%9.20%11.32%6.70%5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PGJZX and RGIYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PGJZX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to RGIYX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGJZX dropped -36.64% vs RGIYX's -39.17%.

RGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGJZX and RGIYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer