PGFIX vs. EDF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PGFIX (Virtus Silvant Focused Growth Fund Class Inst) and EDF (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PGFIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000® Growth Index, while EDF is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. PGFIX is passively managed, while EDF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGFIX returned 18.50%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for EDF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGFIX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for EDF.

Performance

PGFIX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Focused Growth Fund Class Inst (PGFIX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGFIX achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PGFIX has outperformed EDF with an annualized return of 18.50%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.03% annualized return.

PGFIX

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -0.35%
• 6M: 4.75%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 1Y: 12.09%
• 3Y*: 24.83%
• 5Y*: 14.22%
• 10Y*: 18.50%

EDF

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -4.35%
• 6M: 16.08%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 4.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGFIX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGFIX Virtus Silvant Focused Growth Fund Class Inst	3.13%	20.55%	44.11%	53.88%	-34.27%	21.43%	49.12%	34.42%	-5.66%	31.76%
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	14.90%	22.24%	25.54%	21.63%	-27.96%	-8.47%	-31.14%	45.06%	-18.24%	24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PGFIX and EDF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2010	0.29

Return for Risk

PGFIX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGFIX

PGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
PGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
PGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

EDF

EDF Risk / Return Rank: 40
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGFIX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Focused Growth Fund Class Inst (PGFIX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGFIX	EDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.32	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	2.00	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.24	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	2.13	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.56	7.82	-5.26

PGFIX vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGFIX and EDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PGFIX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGFIX drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, roughly equal to the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGFIX and EDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGFIX	EDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.04%	-64.23%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.94%	-9.44%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.21%	-24.32%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.15%	-52.47%	+14.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.15%	-64.23%	+26.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-5.87%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.05%	-21.34%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	2.58%	+2.18%

Volatility

PGFIX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Silvant Focused Growth Fund Class Inst (PGFIX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) at 5.64%. This indicates that PGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGFIX	EDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	5.64%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.21%	12.73%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.54%	15.29%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	25.76%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.03%	30.70%	-7.67%

PGFIX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGFIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGFIX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

PGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than EDF's 13.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund	13.66%	14.49%	15.32%	16.71%	17.31%	12.91%	16.46%	15.67%	19.37%	13.58%	14.75%	17.93%
PGFIX Virtus Silvant Focused Growth Fund Class Inst	5.26%	5.42%	10.27%	2.77%	7.28%	21.59%	9.64%	15.08%	14.71%	1.45%	2.69%	7.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGFIX and EDF in my portfolio?

PGFIX and EDF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGFIX or EDF?

PGFIX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to EDF (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGFIX dropped -66.04% vs EDF's -64.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.