PGEIX vs. EITEX
PGEIX (Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund) and EITEX (Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, PGEIX returned 12.65% vs 32.85% for EITEX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGEIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EITEX.
Performance
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGEIX achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than EITEX's 13.22% return.
PGEIX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -17.69%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EITEX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 32.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PGEIX Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund | 4.51% | 16.07% |
EITEX Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund | 13.22% | 22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGEIX and EITEX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PGEIX and EITEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGEIX vs. EITEX — Risk / Return Rank
PGEIX
EITEX
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) and Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund (EITEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGEIX | EITEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.57 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 3.38 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 12.45 | -10.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGEIX | EITEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.83 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.54 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGEIX drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum EITEX drawdown of -61.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGEIX and EITEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGEIX | EITEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -61.70% | +31.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.87% | -9.88% | -19.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.01% | 0.00% | -22.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -13.93% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Volatility Comparison
Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund (PGEIX) has a higher volatility of 27.45% compared to Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund (EITEX) at 4.25%. This indicates that PGEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EITEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGEIX | EITEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.45% | 4.25% | +23.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.22% | 10.03% | +22.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 11.80% | +22.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.04% | 12.26% | +20.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.04% | 13.75% | +19.29% |
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGEIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EITEX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGEIX vs. EITEX - Dividend Comparison
PGEIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EITEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EITEX Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund | 4.22% | 4.77% | 4.58% | 5.85% | 10.39% | 9.72% | 1.79% | 2.63% | 2.26% | 1.80% | 1.67% | 2.11% |
PGEIX Polen Global Emerging Markets Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGEIX and EITEX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGEIX has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to EITEX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGEIX dropped -29.87% vs EITEX's -61.70%.
EITEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGEIX and EITEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer