PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSIX vs. GMOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Full Spectrum Bond Fund (PFSIX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSIX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 8.37% return.


PFSIX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.09%
6M
2.74%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
4.14%

GMOQX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.21%
YTD
8.37%
6M
9.29%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PFSIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Full Spectrum Bond Fund
1.09%18.47%2.89%10.66%-12.11%-3.05%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
8.37%22.45%12.60%17.76%-16.26%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSIX and GMOQX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.68

The correlation between PFSIX and GMOQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFSIX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSIX
PFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOQX
GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Full Spectrum Bond Fund (PFSIX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSIXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

5.05

-2.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

9.04

-5.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.25

-0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

7.02

-4.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.43

30.53

-23.10

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSIX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSIXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

5.05

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.73

-0.46

Drawdowns

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSIX drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum GMOQX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSIX and GMOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSIXGMOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.20%

-31.41%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.79%

-3.82%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.06%

-9.02%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.04%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-9.72%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

0.88%

+0.90%

Volatility

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Full Spectrum Bond Fund (PFSIX) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) at 1.50%. This indicates that PFSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFSIXGMOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

1.50%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

4.37%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

5.34%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.99%

10.88%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

10.88%

-4.53%

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFSIX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

PFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than GMOQX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
5.88%6.37%6.23%10.36%13.87%7.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFSIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Full Spectrum Bond Fund
7.29%6.45%6.58%4.65%3.75%4.40%4.23%5.22%5.66%5.22%5.20%5.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFSIX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFSIX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to GMOQX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSIX dropped -28.20% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFSIX and GMOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer