PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFOAX vs. PFORX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PFOAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFOAX achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than PFORX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PFOAX has underperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 2.50%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.90% annualized return.


PFOAX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.24%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.06%
1Y
2.48%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
2.50%

PFORX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.28%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.26%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFOAX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
-0.04%3.91%5.29%9.07%-10.60%-2.06%5.75%7.21%2.24%3.11%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
0.12%4.33%5.70%9.52%-10.33%-1.67%6.17%7.64%2.64%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PFOAX and PFORX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1992

0.91

The correlation between PFOAX and PFORX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFOAX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFOAX
PFOAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PFOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PFOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PFORX
PFORX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFORX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PFOAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFOAXPFORXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

0.80

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

1.20

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

0.76

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.97

2.32

-0.35

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the PFORX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFOAX and PFORX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFOAXPFORXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

0.80

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.44

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.92

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.26

-0.33

Drawdowns

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFOAX drawdown since its inception was -14.73%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFOAX and PFORX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFOAXPFORXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-13.87%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-3.99%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.99%

-3.99%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.03%

-13.71%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.38%

-13.87%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-1.37%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-1.95%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.30%

+0.02%

Volatility

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PFOAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) have volatilities of 1.45% and 1.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFOAXPFORXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.47%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

3.38%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

3.78%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

3.61%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

3.16%

-0.03%

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFOAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFOAX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison

PFOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than PFORX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFOAX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
3.70%3.83%4.52%2.62%3.33%1.14%2.07%6.45%2.51%1.06%0.98%8.57%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.10%4.23%4.91%3.02%3.65%1.55%2.46%6.86%2.90%1.46%1.38%9.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PFOAX and PFORX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PFORX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to PFOAX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFOAX dropped -14.73% vs PFORX's -13.87%.

PFORX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFOAX and PFORX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer