PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO
PFL.TO (Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Government Floating Rate Note Index, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PFL.TO returned 2.77% vs 31.57% for QQCI.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFL.TO achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQCI.TO's 16.93% return.
PFL.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 2.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 17.45%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFL.TO Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF | 1.26% | 3.00% | 1.49% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 16.93% | 12.64% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFL.TO and QQCI.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PFL.TO
QQCI.TO
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.40 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.12 | 4.16 | +13.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 58.96 | 14.27 | +44.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFL.TO drawdown since its inception was -2.07%, smaller than the maximum QQCI.TO drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL.TO and QQCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -18.95% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.15% | -7.62% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.69% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -3.03% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 2.22% | -2.17% |
Volatility
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO) is 0.28%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that PFL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 6.48% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | 11.03% | -10.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82% | 14.25% | -13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.97% | 15.87% | -14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 15.87% | -14.54% |
Dividends
PFL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
PFL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than QQCI.TO's 8.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFL.TO Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF | 2.63% | 2.95% | 5.23% | 5.13% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.21% | 2.10% | 1.59% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.95% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.75% | 9.34% | 3.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFL.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFL.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. PFL.TO tracks FTSE Canada Government Floating Rate Note Index, while QQCI.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.
Find the right allocation for PFL.TO and QQCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer