PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFF vs. FFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFF vs. FFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund Inc. (FFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than FFC's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has underperformed FFC with an annualized return of 2.93%, while FFC has yielded a comparatively higher 4.44% annualized return.


PFF

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.03%
6M
-1.43%
YTD
0.89%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
2.93%
ALL TIME*
3.72%

FFC

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.27%
6M
0.33%
YTD
2.10%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
4.44%
ALL TIME*
6.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.53M$1.42M$1.82M
$85.47M$81.60M$92.33M

PFF vs. FFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
0.89%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-4.64%8.10%
FFC
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund Inc.
2.10%14.30%20.06%-0.28%-25.21%-0.81%15.93%38.76%-11.89%16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PFF and FFC is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007

0.46

The correlation between PFF and FFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFF vs. FFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FFC
FFC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFF vs. FFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund Inc. (FFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFFFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.14

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

0.64

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

2.39

-0.97

PFF vs. FFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFF Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFF and FFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFF vs. FFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, smaller than the maximum FFC drawdown of -77.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and FFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFFFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-77.72%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-10.12%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-13.13%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-39.36%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-54.06%

+19.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-0.92%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-10.59%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.71%

-0.66%

Volatility

PFF vs. FFC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund Inc. (FFC) have volatilities of 2.60% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFFFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.63%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

7.98%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.31%

9.46%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.40%

15.34%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

22.74%

-10.04%

Dividends

PFF vs. FFC - Dividend Comparison

PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than FFC's 7.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFC
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Securities Income Fund Inc.
7.62%7.08%6.97%7.54%9.11%7.03%6.18%6.27%8.21%7.29%8.62%8.14%
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
4.97%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFF and FFC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFC has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to PFF (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs FFC's -77.72%.

FFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFF and FFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer