PFD vs. PCSFX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PFD (Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund) and PCSFX (Principal Capital Securities Fund) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PFD returned 3.89%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for PCSFX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFD charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for PCSFX.

Performance

PFD vs. PCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund (PFD) and Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFD achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than PCSFX's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PFD has underperformed PCSFX with an annualized return of 3.89%, while PCSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.53% annualized return.

PFD

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 10.83%
• 3Y*: 12.99%
• 5Y*: -0.58%
• 10Y*: 3.89%

PCSFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 3.48%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFD vs. PCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFD Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund	0.52%	12.96%	21.69%	-4.87%	-31.92%	-2.03%	29.67%	43.46%	-17.25%	10.69%
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund	1.47%	8.96%	12.15%	6.82%	-11.35%	3.74%	7.71%	17.41%	-4.61%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PFD and PCSFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2014	0.25

The correlation between PFD and PCSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFD vs. PCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFD

PFD Risk / Return Rank: 23
PFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PFD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
PFD Martin Ratio Rank: 20

PCSFX

PCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
PCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFD vs. PCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund (PFD) and Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFD	PCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	3.03	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	4.51	-2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.77	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	2.19	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	9.80	-5.48

PFD vs. PCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the PCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFD and PCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFD vs. PCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFD drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than PCSFX's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFD and PCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFD	PCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.70%	-22.42%	-59.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.05%	-2.97%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-2.97%	-11.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.60%	-18.67%	-26.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.39%	-22.42%	-30.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.16%	-0.13%	-20.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.23%	-2.47%	-14.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	0.66%	+1.85%

Volatility

PFD vs. PCSFX - Volatility Comparison

Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund (PFD) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) at 0.56%. This indicates that PFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFD	PCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	0.56%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.75%	1.90%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.73%	2.15%	+6.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	4.29%	+12.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.49%	5.03%	+18.46%

PFD vs. PCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFD has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PCSFX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFD vs. PCSFX - Dividend Comparison

PFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than PCSFX's 5.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCSFX Principal Capital Securities Fund	5.67%	5.80%	5.50%	5.75%	5.68%	4.57%	4.88%	5.43%	6.07%	5.14%	5.08%	5.78%
PFD Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund	7.00%	6.47%	6.46%	6.94%	7.97%	5.82%	5.09%	5.85%	8.14%	6.85%	7.44%	8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFD and PCSFX in my portfolio?

PFD and PCSFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFD or PCSFX?

PFD has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to PCSFX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFD dropped -81.70% vs PCSFX's -22.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.