PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEYAX vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEYAX achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PEYAX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 13.44%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.59% annualized return.


PEYAX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.88%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.92%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
13.44%

NVDA

1D
3.54%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
14.05%
6M
20.66%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
70.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
68.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEYAX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund
10.82%20.09%18.99%15.09%-8.37%26.84%5.87%29.94%-8.63%18.79%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.05%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PEYAX and NVDA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between PEYAX and NVDA has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEYAX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEYAX
PEYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PEYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PEYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEYAXNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

2.48

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

5.89

+8.28

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEYAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEYAX and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEYAX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEYAX and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEYAXNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-89.72%

+32.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-20.21%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-36.88%

+21.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.31%

-66.34%

+51.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-66.34%

+30.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-9.77%

+9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

-36.17%

+22.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

8.48%

-6.61%

Volatility

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Large Cap Value Fund (PEYAX) is 3.99%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that PEYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEYAXNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

12.97%

-8.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

26.83%

-18.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

35.13%

-24.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

51.80%

-37.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

49.87%

-32.79%

Dividends

PEYAX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PEYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PEYAX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund
4.77%5.36%6.80%4.93%1.21%7.09%5.97%3.79%5.67%3.31%2.27%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEYAX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to PEYAX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEYAX dropped -56.92% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

PEYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEYAX and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer