PEY vs. IWS
PEY (Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - PEY tracks the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEY returned 8.73%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for IWS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEY charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
PEY vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEY achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PEY has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 8.73%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.
PEY
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
IWS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
PEY vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 14.10% | 0.56% | 5.25% | 7.29% | 2.45% | 26.15% | -3.85% | 24.76% | -7.49% | 8.78% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 15.78% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEY and IWS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2004 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PEY and IWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEY vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEY
IWS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PEY
IWS
Industrials
PEY
IWS
Consumer Defensive
PEY
IWS
Utilities
PEY
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
PEY
IWS
Healthcare
PEY
IWS
Communication Services
PEY
IWS
Basic Materials
PEY
IWS
Technology
PEY
IWS
Energy
PEY
IWS
Real Estate
PEY
-
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEY vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
PEY
IWS
PEY vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 3.57 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 13.39 | -7.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEY vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEY drawdown since its inception was -72.81%, which is greater than IWS's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEY and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.81% | -62.40% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -7.53% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | -20.57% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | -21.23% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.55% | -43.83% | +2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -1.24% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.85% | -8.00% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.00% | +1.17% |
Volatility
PEY vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) is 4.05%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that PEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.37% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 10.12% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.17% | 13.57% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.33% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 19.35% | -0.47% |
PEY vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEY has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEY vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
PEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than IWS's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 4.49% | 4.85% | 4.44% | 4.58% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.21% | 3.12% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEY and IWS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PEY (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEY dropped -72.81% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.56% vs 8.73% for PEY. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PEY has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.
PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.
PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for PEY and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEY and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer