PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEXMX vs. SSMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PEXMX having a 13.46% return and SSMHX slightly lower at 13.35%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PEXMX having a 11.80% annualized return and SSMHX not far behind at 11.50%.


PEXMX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-2.83%
6M
10.10%
YTD
13.46%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
11.80%
ALL TIME*
9.05%

SSMHX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.88%
6M
9.85%
YTD
13.35%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
11.50%
ALL TIME*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEXMX
T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund
13.46%11.17%16.72%25.32%-26.15%12.09%30.80%32.57%-9.61%16.63%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
13.35%12.90%10.73%25.21%-25.43%13.08%32.46%28.00%-9.21%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PEXMX and SSMHX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015

0.98

The correlation between PEXMX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEXMX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEXMX
PEXMX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PEXMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEXMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEXMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PEXMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEXMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMHX
SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEXMXSSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.16

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

7.53

-0.51

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEXMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEXMX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEXMX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEXMX and SSMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEXMXSSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.82%

-41.61%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-10.03%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-30.38%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-34.84%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.27%

-41.61%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.96%

-3.86%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.55%

-9.03%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.88%

+0.14%

Volatility

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (PEXMX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEXMXSSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.92%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

13.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

17.53%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

22.47%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

22.37%

-0.14%

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEXMX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PEXMX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

PEXMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than SSMHX's 6.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEXMX
T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund
3.55%4.02%7.64%3.64%7.53%14.87%2.99%8.17%6.67%4.50%5.90%4.81%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
6.28%7.12%0.00%1.56%2.31%16.30%2.91%3.65%6.43%4.01%1.71%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PEXMX and SSMHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSMHX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to PEXMX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEXMX dropped -57.82% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEXMX and SSMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer