PEPS vs. XSPI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) and XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. PEPS is actively managed, while XSPI is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PEPS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XSPI.

Performance

PEPS vs. XSPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PEPS

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.90%
• 6M: 7.86%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 1Y: 24.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XSPI

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPS vs. XSPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	7.63%
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPS and XSPI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.97

Return for Risk

PEPS vs. XSPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPS

PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 70
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XSPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPS vs. XSPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEPS	XSPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.27	—	—

Drawdowns

PEPS vs. XSPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, which is greater than XSPI's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and XSPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEPS	XSPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-11.78%	-9.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.74%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-2.35%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PEPS	XSPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.85%	18.06%	-4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.21%	18.06%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	18.06%	+0.15%

PEPS vs. XSPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XSPI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEPS vs. XSPI - Dividend Comparison

PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than XSPI's 8.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	0.92%	1.00%	0.17%
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	8.34%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEPS and XSPI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, PEPS and XSPI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PEPS or XSPI?

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEPS or XSPI?

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEPS or XSPI?

XSPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.

What is the main difference between PEPS and XSPI?

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and NEOS Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 0.98% for XSPI.