PEPS vs. NFLW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) and NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEPS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NFLW.

Performance

PEPS vs. NFLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEPS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than NFLW's -16.78% return.

PEPS

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.44%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 31.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLW

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -12.48%
• YTD: -16.78%
• 6M: -26.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPS vs. NFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	10.67%	18.03%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-16.78%	-29.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPS and NFLW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

PEPS vs. NFLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPS

PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 73
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPS vs. NFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEPS	NFLW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEPS	NFLW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	-1.05	+2.10

Drawdowns

PEPS vs. NFLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, smaller than the maximum NFLW drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and NFLW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEPS	NFLW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-50.73%	+29.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-47.00%	+46.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-26.84%	+24.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PEPS	NFLW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	40.34%	-27.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.31%	40.34%	-22.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	40.34%	-22.03%

PEPS vs. NFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEPS vs. NFLW - Dividend Comparison

PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than NFLW's 73.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	73.24%	38.89%	0.00%
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	0.88%	1.00%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEPS and NFLW in my portfolio?

PEPS and NFLW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PEPS or NFLW?

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEPS or NFLW?

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEPS or NFLW?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

What is the main difference between PEPS and NFLW?

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 0.99% for NFLW.