PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEPFX vs. WAFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund (PEPFX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEPFX achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than WAFMX's 2.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PEPFX has outperformed WAFMX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while WAFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.44% annualized return.


PEPFX

1D
-1.01%
1M
0.58%
YTD
17.11%
6M
12.76%
1Y
29.47%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
11.99%

WAFMX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
2.50%
6M
0.82%
1Y
-2.64%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
-1.98%
10Y*
3.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEPFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund
17.11%20.60%2.45%22.46%-10.50%15.79%9.76%13.56%-12.62%29.07%
WAFMX
Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund
2.50%4.35%10.67%28.16%-41.11%8.60%28.24%26.47%-18.49%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPFX and WAFMX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2015

0.59

The correlation between PEPFX and WAFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEPFX vs. WAFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPFX
PEPFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PEPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WAFMX
WAFMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WAFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WAFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund (PEPFX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEPFXWAFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.98

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

-0.19

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

-0.47

+10.56

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the WAFMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEPFX and WAFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEPFXWAFMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

-0.16

+2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

-0.11

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.20

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.32

+0.20

Drawdowns

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPFX drawdown since its inception was -46.88%, smaller than the maximum WAFMX drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPFX and WAFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPFXWAFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.88%

-49.51%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-12.85%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-15.26%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-49.51%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-49.51%

+2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-19.80%

+18.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-16.79%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

5.03%

-2.06%

Volatility

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund (PEPFX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) at 3.84%. This indicates that PEPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPFXWAFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.84%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

11.94%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.20%

14.61%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

17.57%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

16.87%

+0.42%

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WAFMX's 2.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEPFX vs. WAFMX - Dividend Comparison

PEPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while WAFMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEPFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund
2.49%2.91%1.99%4.05%11.30%9.12%9.73%2.21%11.05%8.06%2.74%2.46%
WAFMX
Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEPFX and WAFMX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEPFX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to WAFMX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEPFX dropped -46.88% vs WAFMX's -49.51%.

PEPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEPFX and WAFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer