PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEO vs. GRHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEO vs. GRHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) and Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEO achieves a 18.52% return, which is significantly higher than GRHIX's 6.47% return.


PEO

1D
0.77%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
18.52%
6M
18.19%
1Y
24.20%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
17.01%
10Y*
9.52%

GRHIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-9.75%
YTD
6.47%
6M
4.65%
1Y
40.57%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEO vs. GRHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEO
Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund
18.52%9.98%13.58%0.91%41.77%53.75%-26.37%20.96%-23.11%4.65%
GRHIX
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund
6.47%61.65%-1.51%16.61%16.38%62.15%-2.74%0.01%-30.03%-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PEO and GRHIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between PEO and GRHIX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEO vs. GRHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEO
PEO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GRHIX
GRHIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GRHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GRHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEO vs. GRHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) and Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEOGRHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.53

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.31

7.86

-1.54

PEO vs. GRHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GRHIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEO and GRHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEO vs. GRHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEO drawdown since its inception was -71.88%, roughly equal to the maximum GRHIX drawdown of -70.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEO and GRHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEOGRHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.88%

-70.61%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-15.79%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-25.32%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.30%

-31.47%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.96%

-15.79%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-18.18%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

5.08%

-1.23%

Volatility

PEO vs. GRHIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) is 5.41%, while Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that PEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEOGRHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

8.30%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

19.20%

-4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

25.36%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

29.12%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

29.50%

-2.17%

PEO vs. GRHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GRHIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEO vs. GRHIX - Dividend Comparison

PEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than GRHIX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRHIX
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund
3.19%3.39%4.02%3.19%1.21%3.25%2.03%0.57%1.18%0.51%0.00%0.00%
PEO
Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund
8.12%9.43%8.14%6.54%7.48%5.51%6.42%6.68%5.63%5.95%5.65%7.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEO and GRHIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRHIX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to PEO (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEO dropped -71.88% vs GRHIX's -70.61%.

GRHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEO and GRHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer