PEMX vs. GOOY
PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Putnam, while GOOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PEMX returned 68.11% vs 81.48% for GOOY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.
Performance
PEMX vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 37.04% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 13.92% return.
PEMX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 8.00%
- YTD
- 37.04%
- 6M
- 41.88%
- 1Y
- 68.11%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 81.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEMX vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 37.04% | 34.01% | 17.21% | 6.28% |
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.92% | 53.95% | 12.58% | -3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMX and GOOY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMX vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank
PEMX
GOOY
PEMX vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEMX | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.60 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 5.06 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.36 | 18.64 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEMX vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and GOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMX | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -24.40% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.45% | -16.15% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -8.37% | +5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -6.27% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 4.38% | -0.59% |
Volatility
PEMX vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) at 6.21%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMX | GOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | 6.21% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 17.39% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.64% | 23.33% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 23.29% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 23.29% | -4.35% |
PEMX vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMX vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison
PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than GOOY's 49.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 49.78% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 5.11% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMX and GOOY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEMX has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs GOOY's -24.40%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 68.11% for PEMX. On fees, PEMX is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 68.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEMX is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 49.78%, compared with 5.11% for PEMX.
PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GOOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMX and GOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer