PEMX vs. DBO
PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Putnam, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. PEMX is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 35.01%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
PEMX vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 41.25% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.
PEMX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 41.25%
- 6M
- 46.76%
- 1Y
- 76.56%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 80.66%
- 6M
- 78.46%
- 1Y
- 78.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
PEMX vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 41.25% | 34.01% | 17.21% | 15.13% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 80.66% | -11.71% | 7.85% | 3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMX and DBO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PEMX and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.28, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
PEMX vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEMX
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
PEMX
DBO
-
Financial Services
PEMX
DBO
Industrials
PEMX
DBO
-
Communication Services
PEMX
DBO
-
Utilities
PEMX
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEMX
DBO
-
Basic Materials
PEMX
DBO
-
Healthcare
PEMX
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
PEMX
DBO
-
Real Estate
PEMX
DBO
-
Energy
PEMX
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMX vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
PEMX
DBO
PEMX vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEMX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.58 | 2.28 | +1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | 2.88 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.37 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.39 | 4.62 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.27 | 9.43 | +11.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEMX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58 | 2.28 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 0.02 | +1.99 |
Drawdowns
PEMX vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -90.18% | +75.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.45% | -18.19% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -28.20% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.46% | +52.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -62.25% | +59.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 8.92% | -5.26% |
Volatility
PEMX vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) is 9.60%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that PEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 13.25% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.74% | 28.15% | -9.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.49% | 34.54% | -13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 32.28% | -14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 31.78% | -13.59% |
PEMX vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMX vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than DBO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.94% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 4.96% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMX and DBO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to PEMX (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 35.01% vs 20.95% for DBO. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, PEMX has been the lower-risk option at 9.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 35.01% return vs 20.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.
PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 1.94% for DBO.
PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.78% for DBO.
PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMX and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer