PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMGX vs. POSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMGX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than POSIX's 9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PEMGX has outperformed POSIX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while POSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.


PEMGX

1D
0.37%
1M
2.69%
YTD
-6.16%
6M
-7.75%
1Y
-8.82%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
12.40%

POSIX

1D
0.57%
1M
0.29%
YTD
9.83%
6M
9.28%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEMGX
Principal MidCap Fund Class A
-6.16%1.39%23.50%25.60%-23.35%24.87%17.95%49.15%-7.10%24.93%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
9.83%7.57%0.67%10.87%-26.74%23.45%-3.91%24.53%-3.35%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMGX and POSIX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2007

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between PEMGX and POSIX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMGX vs. POSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMGX
PEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

POSIX
POSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
POSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
POSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
POSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
POSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEMGXPOSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.19

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

1.23

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

4.42

-5.27

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the POSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMGX and POSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.41%, which is greater than POSIX's maximum drawdown of -68.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMGX and POSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMGXPOSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.41%

-68.45%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-9.97%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-18.02%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-34.15%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.58%

-41.70%

+1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-3.38%

-8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.24%

-13.90%

-19.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.35%

2.78%

+6.57%

Volatility

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund (POSIX) at 3.96%. This indicates that PEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMGXPOSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.96%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

9.38%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

12.09%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

16.31%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

16.95%

+2.19%

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than POSIX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMGX vs. POSIX - Dividend Comparison

PEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than POSIX's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEMGX
Principal MidCap Fund Class A
6.51%6.11%6.55%2.58%3.31%8.24%1.12%9.02%12.48%3.32%2.25%6.28%
POSIX
Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund
2.40%2.64%2.57%2.63%1.12%2.40%1.13%6.32%3.81%4.16%3.70%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEMGX and POSIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEMGX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to POSIX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMGX dropped -84.41% vs POSIX's -68.45%.

POSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMGX and POSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer