PEMGX vs. HDPMX
PEMGX (Principal MidCap Fund Class A) and HDPMX (Hodges Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PEMGX returned 12.40%/yr vs 16.05%/yr for HDPMX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEMGX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for HDPMX.
Performance
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMGX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than HDPMX's 31.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PEMGX has underperformed HDPMX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while HDPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.05% annualized return.
PEMGX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -7.75%
- 1Y
- -8.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
HDPMX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 31.24%
- 6M
- 28.69%
- 1Y
- 49.15%
- 3Y*
- 35.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.05%
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMGX Principal MidCap Fund Class A | -6.16% | 1.39% | 23.50% | 25.60% | -23.35% | 24.87% | 17.95% | 49.15% | -7.10% | 24.93% |
HDPMX Hodges Fund | 31.24% | 24.06% | 29.32% | 29.81% | -21.80% | 29.50% | 29.58% | 23.02% | -34.39% | 13.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMGX and HDPMX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PEMGX and HDPMX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMGX vs. HDPMX — Risk / Return Rank
PEMGX
HDPMX
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Hodges Fund (HDPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEMGX | HDPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.37 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 4.04 | -4.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 15.56 | -16.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.41%, which is greater than HDPMX's maximum drawdown of -69.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMGX and HDPMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMGX | HDPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.41% | -69.66% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.38% | -13.05% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.38% | -32.65% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -36.68% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.58% | -67.16% | +26.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -1.10% | -11.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -15.72% | -17.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.35% | 3.39% | +5.96% |
Volatility
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) is 4.43%, while Hodges Fund (HDPMX) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that PEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMGX | HDPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 9.72% | -5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 18.37% | -6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 23.82% | -9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 29.84% | -11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 30.44% | -11.30% |
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than HDPMX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMGX vs. HDPMX - Dividend Comparison
PEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than HDPMX's 7.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDPMX Hodges Fund | 7.24% | 9.50% | 15.93% | 0.72% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.67% | 7.26% | 0.00% | 1.04% |
PEMGX Principal MidCap Fund Class A | 6.51% | 6.11% | 6.55% | 2.58% | 3.31% | 8.24% | 1.12% | 9.02% | 12.48% | 3.32% | 2.25% | 6.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMGX and HDPMX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDPMX has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to PEMGX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMGX dropped -84.41% vs HDPMX's -69.66%.
HDPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMGX and HDPMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer