PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L) and L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMD.L achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN.L's 4.62% return.


PEMD.L

1D
0.75%
1M
1.05%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.07%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*

DRGN.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.37%
YTD
4.62%
6M
6.29%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
4.99%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PEMD.L
Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist
1.58%12.80%6.20%10.59%-16.57%-2.57%1.71%
DRGN.L
L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF
4.62%5.43%3.15%0.46%-5.32%7.15%0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMD.L and DRGN.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.31

The correlation between PEMD.L and DRGN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMD.L
PEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGN.L
DRGN.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DRGN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L) and L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEMD.LDRGN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.56

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

5.58

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

22.51

-13.65

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the DRGN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMD.L and DRGN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEMD.LDRGN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.45

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.49

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.64

-0.40

Drawdowns

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.74%, which is greater than DRGN.L's maximum drawdown of -11.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMD.L and DRGN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMD.LDRGN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.74%

-11.71%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

-1.47%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.00%

-3.49%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

-11.71%

-14.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.30%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-3.61%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.36%

+0.78%

Volatility

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) at 1.21%. This indicates that PEMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMD.LDRGN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

1.21%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

3.00%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

3.36%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.31%

4.58%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.17%

4.53%

+6.64%

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DRGN.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMD.L vs. DRGN.L - Dividend Comparison

PEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than DRGN.L's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRGN.L
L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF
1.63%1.94%2.31%2.45%2.76%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEMD.L
Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist
5.45%5.49%5.83%5.54%4.94%3.93%3.60%4.99%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEMD.L and DRGN.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PEMD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PEMD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DRGN.L.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PEMD.L and 0.30% for DRGN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMD.L and DRGN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer