PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PELAX vs. PFORX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PELAX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A (PELAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PELAX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PELAX has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 4.27%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.90% annualized return.


PELAX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.43%
6M
2.79%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
4.27%

PFORX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.28%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.26%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PELAX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PELAX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A
1.43%22.47%-1.15%15.23%-7.64%-8.12%1.76%16.76%-7.87%14.98%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
0.12%4.33%5.70%9.52%-10.33%-1.67%6.17%7.64%2.64%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PELAX and PFORX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

0.13

Over the past year, PELAX and PFORX have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PELAX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PELAX
PELAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PELAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PELAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PELAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PELAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PELAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

PFORX
PFORX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFORX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PELAX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A (PELAX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PELAXPFORXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.76

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

2.32

+3.59

PELAX vs. PFORX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PELAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the PFORX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PELAX and PFORX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PELAXPFORXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

0.80

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.92

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.26

-1.01

Drawdowns

PELAX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PELAX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELAX and PFORX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PELAXPFORXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-13.87%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-3.99%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.55%

-3.99%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

-13.71%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.94%

-13.87%

-11.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-1.37%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-1.95%

-11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.30%

+0.82%

Volatility

PELAX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A (PELAX) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.47%. This indicates that PELAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PELAXPFORXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

1.47%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

3.38%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.09%

3.78%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.04%

3.61%

+4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

3.16%

+5.74%

PELAX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PELAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PELAX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison

PELAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than PFORX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PELAX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A
6.66%6.33%6.67%4.89%2.93%4.92%4.50%5.76%6.44%5.45%5.24%4.99%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.10%4.23%4.91%3.02%3.65%1.55%2.46%6.86%2.90%1.46%1.38%9.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PELAX and PFORX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PELAX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to PFORX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PELAX dropped -36.92% vs PFORX's -13.87%.

PELAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PELAX and PFORX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer