PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEBIX vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEBIX vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEBIX achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 20.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PEBIX has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 4.58%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.48% annualized return.


PEBIX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.65%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.45%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.58%

IXC

1D
0.67%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
20.55%
6M
21.59%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
17.36%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEBIX vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEBIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund
3.00%15.48%7.83%11.48%-17.48%-2.00%6.56%14.91%-4.17%10.60%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
20.55%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PEBIX and IXC is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001

0.18

The correlation between PEBIX and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEBIX vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEBIX
PEBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PEBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PEBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEBIX vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEBIXIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.28

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.33

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.56

8.08

+5.47

PEBIX vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEBIX and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEBIX vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEBIX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEBIX and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEBIXIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-67.88%

+32.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-13.81%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.31%

-19.06%

+12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

-24.93%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

-64.16%

+36.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-13.24%

+12.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-17.46%

+12.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

3.98%

-2.99%

Volatility

PEBIX vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) is 1.49%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that PEBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEBIXIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

6.46%

-4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

15.91%

-12.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

19.08%

-14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

23.50%

-17.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

26.82%

-20.44%

PEBIX vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEBIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEBIX vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

PEBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than IXC's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
3.15%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
PEBIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund
6.41%6.68%6.81%5.36%6.21%4.41%4.23%4.47%4.41%5.10%5.57%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEBIX and IXC have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to PEBIX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEBIX dropped -35.49% vs IXC's -67.88%.

PEBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEBIX and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer