PEBIX vs. EIDOX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX).
PEBIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jul 30, 1997. EIDOX is a passively managed fund by Eaton Vance that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan EMB (JEMB) Hard Currency / Local Currency 50-50 Index. It was launched on Sep 3, 2015.
Performance
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEBIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund | -1.93% | 15.48% | 7.83% | 11.48% | -17.48% | -2.00% | 6.56% | 14.91% | -4.17% | 10.60% |
EIDOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I | 1.43% | 15.59% | 14.78% | 11.40% | -6.25% | 1.52% | 7.39% | 18.25% | -4.28% | 12.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEBIX achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than EIDOX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PEBIX has underperformed EIDOX with an annualized return of 4.52%, while EIDOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.
PEBIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 10.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
EIDOX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEBIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than EIDOX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PEBIX vs. EIDOX — Risk / Return Rank
PEBIX
EIDOX
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEBIX | EIDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 4.16 | -2.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 5.72 | -2.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 2.03 | -0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.85 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 15.67 | -6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEBIX | EIDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 4.16 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.67 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 1.63 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.65 | -0.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between PEBIX and EIDOX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Dividend Comparison
PEBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than EIDOX's 11.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEBIX PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund | 6.11% | 6.68% | 6.81% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.41% | 4.23% | 4.47% | 4.41% | 5.10% | 5.57% | 6.08% |
EIDOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I | 11.13% | 9.41% | 8.52% | 8.97% | 9.13% | 7.82% | 7.66% | 7.81% | 8.10% | 7.85% | 4.10% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEBIX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than EIDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEBIX and EIDOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEBIX | EIDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -19.06% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | -3.56% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.10% | -17.42% | -10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.10% | -19.06% | -9.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -3.56% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -2.50% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.88% | +0.21% |
Volatility
PEBIX vs. EIDOX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX) have volatilities of 1.84% and 1.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PEBIX | EIDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 1.85% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.69% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.17% | 3.59% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 4.61% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 4.76% | +1.60% |