PDX vs. QYLG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG).

PDX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Feb 1, 2019. QYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020.

Performance

PDX vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PDX vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund	19.83%	-10.59%	36.99%	44.51%	23.02%	68.79%	28.60%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	-3.06%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	18.29%	12.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDX achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly higher than QYLG's -3.06% return.

PDX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 9.93%
• YTD: 19.83%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 28.85%
• 5Y*: 27.34%
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: 17.63%
• 5Y*: 9.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDX vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDX has a 2.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

PDX

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund

QYLG

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF

Return for Risk

PDX vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDX

PDX Risk / Return Rank: 22
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 72
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDX vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDX	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.07	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	1.68	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.26	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	1.76	-1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.74	8.72	-6.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDX vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDX and QYLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDX	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	1.07	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.55	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.66	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between PDX and QYLG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PDX vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

PDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.72%, more than QYLG's 18.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund	20.72%	24.34%	6.31%	4.30%	5.89%	5.28%	14.11%	9.58%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	18.97%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PDX vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDX drawdown since its inception was -80.63%, which is greater than QYLG's maximum drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDX and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDX	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.63%	-29.98%	-50.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-11.45%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.24%	-29.98%	-7.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.96%	-5.54%	-7.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.92%	-6.60%	-12.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.25%	2.32%	+5.93%

Volatility

PDX vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) is 4.60%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that PDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDX	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	5.88%	-1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	10.13%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.72%	18.85%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.78%	18.06%	+7.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.86%	18.09%	+18.77%