PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDSZX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDSZX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund (PDSZX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDSZX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PDSZX has underperformed NPV with an annualized return of 1.89%, while NPV has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.


PDSZX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.65%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
1.89%

NPV

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.88%
6M
5.78%
1Y
10.67%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
-1.49%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDSZX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDSZX
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund
1.37%4.64%2.39%4.23%-6.16%0.36%2.85%5.92%1.29%5.11%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.88%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PDSZX and NPV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDSZX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDSZX
PDSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PDSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDSZX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund (PDSZX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDSZXNPVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.20

1.28

+0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.49

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

6.26

+3.77

PDSZX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDSZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDSZX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDSZXNPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

1.55

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

-0.11

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.18

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.29

+0.57

Drawdowns

PDSZX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDSZX drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDSZX and NPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDSZXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-44.25%

+34.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.87%

-4.31%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.71%

-18.29%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.29%

-44.25%

+34.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.14%

-44.25%

+34.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-15.72%

+15.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-10.18%

+8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

1.71%

-1.20%

Volatility

PDSZX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund (PDSZX) is 0.60%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that PDSZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDSZXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

1.83%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.27%

5.05%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55%

6.93%

-5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.24%

13.48%

-11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

13.19%

-10.59%

PDSZX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDSZX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDSZX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

PDSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than NPV's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.97%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%
PDSZX
PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund
3.20%3.10%2.56%1.76%1.21%1.03%2.01%2.31%2.37%2.28%2.34%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDSZX and NPV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to PDSZX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDSZX dropped -10.14% vs NPV's -44.25%.

PDSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDSZX and NPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer