PDSZX vs. FMBIX
PDSZX (PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDSZX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PDSZX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDSZX PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund | 1.37% | 4.64% | 2.39% | 4.23% | -6.16% | 0.36% | 2.85% | 1.63% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDSZX and FMBIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PDSZX and FMBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDSZX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
PDSZX
FMBIX
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund (PDSZX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDSZX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDSZX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDSZX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | — | — |
Volatility
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDSZX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | — | — |
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDSZX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDSZX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
PDSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDSZX PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund | 3.20% | 3.10% | 2.56% | 1.76% | 1.21% | 1.03% | 2.01% | 2.31% | 2.37% | 2.28% | 2.34% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDSZX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PDSZX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer