PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDSYX vs. GBMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDSYX achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than GBMFX's 11.77% return.


PDSYX

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
5.06%
6M
5.07%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

GBMFX

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.71%
YTD
11.77%
6M
13.88%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PDSYX
Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund
5.06%7.90%3.65%2.45%-5.36%14.81%2.43%4.08%
GBMFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund
11.77%22.89%4.33%13.46%-2.24%2.97%-2.50%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PDSYX and GBMFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.66

The correlation between PDSYX and GBMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDSYX vs. GBMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDSYX
PDSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PDSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PDSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GBMFX
GBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDSYXGBMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.81

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

4.96

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.30

19.07

+2.23

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDSYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the GBMFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDSYX and GBMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDSYXGBMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

4.05

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.17

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.99

-0.42

Drawdowns

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDSYX drawdown since its inception was -30.01%, which is greater than GBMFX's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDSYX and GBMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDSYXGBMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.01%

-23.40%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-5.78%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.84%

-7.16%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.95%

-14.35%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.18%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-3.27%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

1.50%

-1.05%

Volatility

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX) is 0.95%, while GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that PDSYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDSYXGBMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

1.98%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

5.47%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

7.08%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

7.30%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.72%

8.00%

+0.72%

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDSYX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GBMFX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDSYX vs. GBMFX - Dividend Comparison

PDSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than GBMFX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBMFX
GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund
3.72%4.16%5.14%5.64%3.20%2.46%3.73%3.35%3.67%2.39%1.60%2.10%
PDSYX
Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund
1.76%1.85%2.18%2.06%1.58%7.46%2.70%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDSYX and GBMFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBMFX has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to PDSYX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDSYX dropped -30.01% vs GBMFX's -23.40%.

GBMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.05 vs 3.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDSYX and GBMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer