PDRDX vs. MNTRX
PDRDX (Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund) and MNTRX (Allspring Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - PDRDX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Principal, while MNTRX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, PDRDX returned 6.35%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for MNTRX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDRDX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for MNTRX.
Performance
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDRDX achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than MNTRX's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PDRDX has outperformed MNTRX with an annualized return of 6.35%, while MNTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.
PDRDX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.35%
MNTRX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.40%
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDRDX Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund | 11.44% | 14.63% | 3.09% | 3.22% | -6.19% | 17.30% | 3.97% | 15.02% | -7.90% | 10.18% |
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 0.29% | 7.16% | 1.38% | 5.37% | -13.82% | -2.10% | 8.51% | 8.18% | -0.57% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDRDX and MNTRX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2010 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, PDRDX and MNTRX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDRDX vs. MNTRX — Risk / Return Rank
PDRDX
MNTRX
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) and Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDRDX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 1.56 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | 4.59 | +9.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDRDX drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, which is greater than MNTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDRDX and MNTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDRDX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -19.36% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -3.06% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.94% | -6.27% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -18.91% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.55% | -19.36% | -9.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -3.14% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -2.46% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 1.04% | +0.39% |
Volatility
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) at 1.35%. This indicates that PDRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDRDX | MNTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 1.35% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 2.93% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.31% | 3.95% | +5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.02% | 6.04% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.81% | 4.96% | +5.85% |
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDRDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than MNTRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDRDX vs. MNTRX - Dividend Comparison
PDRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than MNTRX's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 4.06% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.19% | 1.85% | 1.75% | 6.35% | 2.46% | 2.33% | 1.74% | 1.97% | 1.45% |
PDRDX Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund | 3.85% | 4.19% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 12.88% | 6.56% | 0.52% | 2.36% | 3.47% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDRDX and MNTRX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDRDX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to MNTRX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDRDX dropped -28.55% vs MNTRX's -19.36%.
PDRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDRDX and MNTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer