PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDRDX vs. LFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) and LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PDRDX having a 9.49% return and LFMIX slightly higher at 9.64%. Over the past 10 years, PDRDX has outperformed LFMIX with an annualized return of 6.26%, while LFMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.


PDRDX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.90%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
6.26%

LFMIX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.50%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDRDX
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund
9.49%14.63%3.09%3.22%-6.19%17.30%3.97%15.02%-7.90%10.18%
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
9.64%2.89%6.77%-6.55%15.43%0.07%4.55%12.71%-5.11%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PDRDX and LFMIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2011

0.11

Over the past year, PDRDX and LFMIX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDRDX vs. LFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDRDX
PDRDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PDRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PDRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LFMIX
LFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) and LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDRDXLFMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.50

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

5.81

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

16.80

-5.82

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the LFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDRDX and LFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDRDX drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, which is greater than LFMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDRDX and LFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDRDXLFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.55%

-22.68%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-2.60%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.94%

-8.88%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-12.26%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-12.26%

-16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-1.04%

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-6.75%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.90%

+0.67%

Volatility

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX) at 1.35%. This indicates that PDRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDRDXLFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.35%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

4.38%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

5.68%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

7.21%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

7.54%

+3.26%

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDRDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than LFMIX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDRDX vs. LFMIX - Dividend Comparison

PDRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than LFMIX's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
2.86%3.14%3.21%3.17%14.35%4.95%4.73%4.66%3.12%5.89%1.95%3.08%
PDRDX
Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund
3.78%4.19%2.43%2.52%12.88%6.56%0.52%2.36%3.47%2.21%2.61%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDRDX and LFMIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDRDX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to LFMIX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDRDX dropped -28.55% vs LFMIX's -22.68%.

LFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDRDX and LFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer