PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDMIX vs. FUTBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDMIX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than FUTBX's -0.14% return.


PDMIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.39%
6M
0.41%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.48%

FUTBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDMIX
PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund
0.83%8.43%1.59%6.03%-13.96%-0.65%5.78%6.57%0.83%2.06%
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.14%6.12%0.70%4.19%-13.00%-2.54%7.76%7.30%0.95%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PDMIX and FUTBX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.81

The correlation between PDMIX and FUTBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDMIX vs. FUTBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDMIX
PDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTBX
FUTBX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FUTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDMIXFUTBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.86

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

2.26

+2.67

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the FUTBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDMIX and FUTBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDMIX drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, smaller than the maximum FUTBX drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDMIX and FUTBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDMIXFUTBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-19.69%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-3.09%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.13%

-5.42%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

-17.03%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-7.81%

+6.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-6.96%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.18%

-0.15%

Volatility

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund (PDMIX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) at 1.07%. This indicates that PDMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDMIXFUTBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.07%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.49%

2.84%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

3.76%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

5.81%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.08%

5.14%

-0.06%

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDMIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTBX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDMIX vs. FUTBX - Dividend Comparison

PDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than FUTBX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTBX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.70%3.43%2.90%2.12%1.12%0.86%4.54%2.75%2.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%
PDMIX
PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund
4.32%4.29%4.66%3.76%3.84%2.03%2.40%3.41%3.10%2.96%2.93%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PDMIX and FUTBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDMIX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to FUTBX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDMIX dropped -18.64% vs FUTBX's -19.69%.

PDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDMIX and FUTBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer