PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDLFX vs. FFSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2060 Fund (PDLFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDLFX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than FFSDX's 13.87% return.


PDLFX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.86%
YTD
12.62%
6M
13.55%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*

FFSDX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.87%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.37%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PDLFX
Prudential Day One 2060 Fund
12.62%19.51%20.85%18.36%-15.54%19.60%11.42%8.03%
FFSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K
13.87%23.80%14.16%20.69%-18.22%16.59%18.26%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PDLFX and FFSDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.96

The correlation between PDLFX and FFSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDLFX vs. FFSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDLFX
PDLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PDLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PDLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSDX
FFSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2060 Fund (PDLFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDLFXFFSDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

2.48

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

3.42

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.24

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.96

14.47

-1.50

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDLFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FFSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDLFX and FFSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDLFXFFSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.70

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.79

-0.05

Drawdowns

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDLFX drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, which is greater than FFSDX's maximum drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDLFX and FFSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDLFXFFSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.68%

-31.03%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-9.80%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-15.40%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-27.29%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-5.87%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.19%

-0.03%

Volatility

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2060 Fund (PDLFX) is 3.69%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that PDLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDLFXFFSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.27%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

10.56%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

12.81%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

15.05%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.03%

-0.62%

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDLFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDLFX vs. FFSDX - Dividend Comparison

PDLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than FFSDX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K
4.91%3.68%2.75%2.15%8.83%7.86%2.31%1.49%0.00%0.00%
PDLFX
Prudential Day One 2060 Fund
3.74%4.21%15.72%3.40%8.15%8.44%1.43%3.99%4.65%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PDLFX and FFSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSDX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to PDLFX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDLFX dropped -34.68% vs FFSDX's -31.03%.

FFSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDLFX and FFSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer