PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIZX vs. FTTWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIZX achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than FTTWX's 6.82% return.


PDIZX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.43%
YTD
4.33%
6M
4.91%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*

FTTWX

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.78%
YTD
6.82%
6M
7.52%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
4.33%11.93%8.54%18.82%-14.27%12.07%11.36%
FTTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M
6.82%15.50%7.43%12.89%-17.06%9.39%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PDIZX and FTTWX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.95

The correlation between PDIZX and FTTWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDIZX vs. FTTWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIZX
PDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FTTWX
FTTWX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FTTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIZXFTTWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.63

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

11.38

+4.01

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FTTWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIZX and FTTWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIZXFTTWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.13

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.49

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.46

+0.28

Drawdowns

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIZX drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, smaller than the maximum FTTWX drawdown of -49.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIZX and FTTWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIZXFTTWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.03%

-49.59%

+28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-6.51%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.31%

-8.75%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

-23.98%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.43%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-5.97%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.50%

-0.63%

Volatility

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) is 1.70%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M (FTTWX) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that PDIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTTWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIZXFTTWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.98%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

6.68%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

8.06%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

9.88%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.46%

10.14%

+0.32%

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIZX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FTTWX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDIZX vs. FTTWX - Dividend Comparison

PDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, less than FTTWX's 7.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTTWX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class M
7.48%7.42%3.51%1.68%8.57%9.02%5.88%6.17%9.28%4.01%4.17%4.76%
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
7.31%7.63%4.91%3.15%7.76%12.48%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PDIZX and FTTWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTTWX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to PDIZX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDIZX dropped -21.03% vs FTTWX's -49.59%.

PDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDIZX and FTTWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer