PDIAX vs. TANDX
PDIAX (Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund) and TANDX (Castle Tandem Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PDIAX returned 6.96%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for TANDX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDIAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for TANDX.
Performance
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDIAX achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.18% return.
PDIAX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.34%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
TANDX
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -13.13%
- 1Y
- -15.71%
- 3Y*
- 1.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDIAX Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund | 11.50% | 13.45% | 9.10% | 1.08% | -2.58% | 17.04% | 14.51% | 14.68% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | -13.18% | 3.67% | 7.66% | 8.42% | -7.87% | 19.03% | 13.39% | 12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDIAX and TANDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PDIAX and TANDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDIAX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank
PDIAX
TANDX
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund (PDIAX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDIAX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.74 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | -0.98 | +3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | -2.30 | +14.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDIAX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | -1.70 | +3.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.00 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.01 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDIAX drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIAX and TANDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDIAX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -93.93% | +40.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -16.13% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.04% | -93.93% | +81.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -93.93% | +77.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -93.93% | +93.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -20.25% | +11.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 6.85% | -5.38% |
Volatility
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund (PDIAX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 2.52%. This indicates that PDIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDIAX | TANDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.52% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 7.18% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.30% | 9.26% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 595.57% | -582.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 496.55% | -479.63% |
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDIAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDIAX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison
PDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than TANDX's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDIAX Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund | 6.18% | 6.52% | 2.88% | 2.71% | 5.83% | 4.16% | 35.18% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 15.53% | 3.60% | 19.74% |
TANDX Castle Tandem Fund | 7.11% | 6.17% | 3.71% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 4.57% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDIAX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDIAX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to TANDX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDIAX dropped -53.27% vs TANDX's -93.93%.
PDIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDIAX and TANDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer