PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIAX vs. AMFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund (PDIAX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIAX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 13.89% return.


PDIAX

1D
0.04%
1M
3.41%
YTD
12.85%
6M
13.01%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
10.73%

AMFEX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.95%
YTD
13.89%
6M
15.12%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PDIAX
Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund
12.85%13.45%9.10%1.08%-2.58%17.04%14.51%28.11%-9.30%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
13.89%17.33%16.28%17.32%-14.08%22.58%12.70%24.62%-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PDIAX and AMFEX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018

0.82

The correlation between PDIAX and AMFEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDIAX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIAX
PDIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PDIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFEX
AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund (PDIAX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDIAXAMFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.59

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

19.44

-5.78

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIAX and AMFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIAX drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIAX and AMFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIAXAMFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

-30.41%

-22.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-6.07%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.04%

-15.23%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-21.21%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.14%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-4.29%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.43%

+0.03%

Volatility

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund (PDIAX) is 2.86%, while AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that PDIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIAXAMFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.55%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

7.65%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

9.89%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.03%

14.24%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

16.93%

0.00%

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDIAX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

PDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, less than AMFEX's 10.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
10.53%11.99%9.19%0.92%4.82%0.22%0.44%0.78%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDIAX
Virtus KAR Equity Income Fund
6.10%6.52%2.88%2.71%5.83%4.16%35.18%0.95%1.20%15.53%3.60%19.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDIAX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMFEX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to PDIAX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDIAX dropped -53.27% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.

AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDIAX and AMFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer