PDGZX vs. PFN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PDGZX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund) and PFN (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II) are both mutual funds - PDGZX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by PIMCO, while PFN is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PDGZX returned 9.71%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for PFN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDGZX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for PFN.

Performance

PDGZX vs. PFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDGZX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than PFN's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PDGZX has outperformed PFN with an annualized return of 9.71%, while PFN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.

PDGZX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 9.60%
• 1Y: 22.00%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

PFN

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: -4.15%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDGZX vs. PFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund	9.17%	16.92%	10.09%	16.52%	-17.06%	15.06%	13.72%	22.67%	-6.75%	18.13%
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II	-4.15%	13.07%	15.72%	15.43%	-17.65%	5.14%	3.97%	21.84%	0.94%	20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PDGZX and PFN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.40

Return for Risk

PDGZX vs. PFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDGZX

PDGZX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PDGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PDGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
PDGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PDGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PDGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PFN

PFN Risk / Return Rank: 6
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDGZX vs. PFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDGZX	PFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	0.53	+2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	0.82	+2.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.11	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	0.49	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.21	1.95	+12.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDGZX vs. PFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the PFN Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDGZX and PFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDGZX	PFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	0.53	+2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.14	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.44	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.28	+0.43

Drawdowns

PDGZX vs. PFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDGZX drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum PFN drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDGZX and PFN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDGZX	PFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.25%	-80.08%	+52.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-10.77%	+3.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.65%	-14.31%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.26%	-33.45%	+9.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.25%	-45.70%	+18.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.19%	+5.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-11.83%	+7.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	2.72%	-1.16%

Volatility

PDGZX vs. PFN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) is 2.79%, while PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that PDGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDGZX	PFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	3.39%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.88%	8.89%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.55%	10.05%	-1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.61%	14.66%	-3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	18.19%	-6.00%

PDGZX vs. PFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDGZX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PFN's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDGZX vs. PFN - Dividend Comparison

PDGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than PFN's 12.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund	4.80%	5.09%	4.17%	2.73%	3.30%	4.92%	2.12%	3.71%	5.84%	2.17%	2.72%	2.40%
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II	12.60%	11.49%	11.57%	11.92%	12.19%	9.71%	9.67%	9.07%	10.81%	9.20%	10.12%	11.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDGZX and PFN in my portfolio?

PDGZX and PFN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDGZX or PFN?

PFN has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PDGZX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDGZX dropped -27.25% vs PFN's -80.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PDGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.