PDGIX vs. FAPCX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PDGIX (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund) and FAPCX (Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund) are both mutual funds - PDGIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while FAPCX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, PDGIX returned 10.10%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for FAPCX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDGIX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FAPCX.

Performance

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PDGIX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PDGIX having a 7.64% return and FAPCX slightly higher at 7.72%.

PDGIX

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 7.64%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 17.81%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: 13.06%

FAPCX

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 12.19%
• 3Y*: 14.88%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDGIX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund	7.64%	14.91%	13.63%	13.82%	-10.08%	26.19%	14.06%	31.90%	-0.93%	10.14%
FAPCX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund	7.72%	18.82%	8.28%	27.54%	-26.25%	12.43%	22.82%	33.52%	-12.55%	15.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PDGIX and FAPCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.77

The correlation between PDGIX and FAPCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PDGIX vs. FAPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDGIX

PDGIX Risk / Return Rank: 54
PDGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PDGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PDGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PDGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PDGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FAPCX

FAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 11
FAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PDGIX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDGIX	FAPCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	0.56	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	0.92	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.12	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	0.73	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	2.73	+6.69

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the FAPCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDGIX and FAPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum FAPCX drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDGIX and FAPCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDGIX	FAPCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.17%	-37.09%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.32%	-14.45%	+7.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.12%	-16.28%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.21%	-37.09%	+17.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-2.13%	+1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-7.72%	+4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	3.84%	-2.05%

Volatility

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PDGIX) is 2.85%, while Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that PDGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDGIX	FAPCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	9.28%	-6.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.79%	16.79%	-9.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.94%	18.74%	-8.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.09%	19.05%	-4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	18.72%	-2.84%

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDGIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FAPCX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDGIX vs. FAPCX - Dividend Comparison

PDGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, less than FAPCX's 8.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FAPCX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund	8.80%	9.48%	2.94%	0.42%	0.40%	8.83%	0.41%	0.87%	0.81%	1.95%	0.00%
PDGIX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund	7.66%	8.16%	4.80%	2.90%	3.99%	2.09%	1.15%	2.44%	3.81%	1.89%	3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDGIX and FAPCX in my portfolio?

PDGIX and FAPCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDGIX or FAPCX?

FAPCX has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to PDGIX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDGIX dropped -33.17% vs FAPCX's -37.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PDGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.