PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDFEX vs. PDBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2030 Fund (PDFEX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDFEX achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's 0.72% return.


PDFEX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.12%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*

PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDFEX
Prudential Day One 2030 Fund
7.09%12.11%19.96%12.14%-13.56%14.36%9.48%19.27%-6.04%15.13%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PDFEX and PDBZX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.20

Over the past year, PDFEX and PDBZX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDFEX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDFEX
PDFEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PDFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PDFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2030 Fund (PDFEX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDFEXPDBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.09

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

6.21

+7.87

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDFEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDFEX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDFEXPDBZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.44

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.15

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.09

-0.24

Drawdowns

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDFEX drawdown since its inception was -24.53%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDFEX and PDBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDFEXPDBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.53%

-20.88%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-3.00%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-5.51%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.63%

-20.81%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-2.31%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.01%

+0.11%

Volatility

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

Prudential Day One 2030 Fund (PDFEX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) have volatilities of 1.99% and 2.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDFEXPDBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.08%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

3.30%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.43%

4.35%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.27%

6.05%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.68%

5.37%

+5.31%

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PDFEX and PDBZX have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

PDFEX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PDFEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than PDBZX's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PDFEX
Prudential Day One 2030 Fund
3.63%3.89%22.09%3.74%8.84%8.52%1.89%5.02%4.15%1.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDFEX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBZX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to PDFEX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDFEX dropped -24.53% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

PDFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDFEX and PDBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer