PDDDX vs. FRHMX
PDDDX (Prudential Day One 2020 Fund) and FRHMX (Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PDDDX returned 10.67%/yr vs 596.10%/yr for FRHMX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDDDX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FRHMX.
Performance
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDDDX achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 1,464,383.96% return.
PDDDX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 10.95%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FRHMX
- 1D
- 1,410,365.12%
- 1M
- 1,421,616.96%
- YTD
- 1,464,383.96%
- 6M
- 1,464,432.61%
- 1Y
- 1,543,480.72%
- 3Y*
- 2,494.75%
- 5Y*
- 596.10%
- 10Y*
- —
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDDDX Prudential Day One 2020 Fund | 4.90% | 10.40% | 15.97% | 9.52% | -12.63% | 36.80% | 8.13% | 4.32% |
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 | 1,464,383.96% | 10.02% | 4.50% | 8.28% | -11.48% | 2.98% | 8.79% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDDDX and FRHMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PDDDX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDDDX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank
PDDDX
FRHMX
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDDDX | FRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -488,363.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 68,097.73 | -68,096.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 470,348.34 | -470,345.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 1,985,653.35 | -1,985,639.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDDDX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDDX and FRHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDDDX | FRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -15.96% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -3.42% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.09% | -4.90% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.64% | -15.96% | -0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | 0.00% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -3.49% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.81% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) is 1.99%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a volatility of 955.41%. This indicates that PDDDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDDDX | FRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 955.41% | -953.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.26% | 955.40% | -951.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20% | 1,413,171.78% | -1,413,166.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 631,989.64% | -631,975.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 538,904.02% | -538,892.66% |
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDDDX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDDDX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison
PDDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than FRHMX's 103.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 | 103.07% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 3.02% | 4.77% | 3.78% | 2.61% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDDDX Prudential Day One 2020 Fund | 3.86% | 4.05% | 19.73% | 3.22% | 8.41% | 28.05% | 1.91% | 3.76% | 3.05% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PDDDX and FRHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRHMX has higher volatility (955.41%) compared to PDDDX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDDDX dropped -18.88% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.
PDDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDDDX and FRHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer