PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBZX vs. PTEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBZX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than PTEZX's 12.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBZX has underperformed PTEZX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while PTEZX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.


PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%

PTEZX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.46%
YTD
12.58%
6M
13.25%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
12.58%16.65%39.29%26.67%-16.52%29.12%11.22%33.36%-7.50%23.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBZX and PTEZX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2000

-0.11

The correlation between PDBZX and PTEZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBZX vs. PTEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PTEZX
PTEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PTEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBZXPTEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.70

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

17.48

-11.27

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PTEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBZX and PTEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBZXPTEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.59

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.84

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.43

+0.66

Drawdowns

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBZX drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum PTEZX drawdown of -55.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBZX and PTEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBZXPTEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-55.81%

+34.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-8.66%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.51%

-26.20%

+20.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.81%

-26.20%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

-36.19%

+15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-11.66%

+9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.83%

-0.82%

Volatility

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) is 2.08%, while PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund (PTEZX) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that PDBZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBZXPTEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

2.96%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

9.45%

-6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

12.35%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

19.96%

-13.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

19.88%

-14.51%

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PDBZX and PTEZX have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

PDBZX vs. PTEZX - Dividend Comparison

PDBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than PTEZX's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PTEZX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Core Equity Fund
10.22%11.51%20.91%3.55%2.72%16.00%2.38%6.76%23.24%15.58%5.37%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBZX and PTEZX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTEZX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PDBZX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBZX dropped -20.88% vs PTEZX's -55.81%.

PTEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBZX and PTEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer