PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBZX vs. PDEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBZX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than PDEZX's 34.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBZX has underperformed PDEZX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while PDEZX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.


PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%

PDEZX

1D
0.04%
1M
4.26%
YTD
34.32%
6M
35.36%
1Y
49.85%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
34.32%14.88%18.48%16.12%-41.65%-0.86%72.88%30.33%-18.26%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBZX and PDEZX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2014

0.03

The correlation between PDBZX and PDEZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBZX vs. PDEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PDEZX
PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBZXPDEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.64

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

12.51

-6.30

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the PDEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBZX and PDEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBZXPDEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.15

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.11

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.41

+0.68

Drawdowns

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBZX drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum PDEZX drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBZX and PDEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBZXPDEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-54.95%

+34.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-13.94%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.51%

-21.92%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.81%

-52.88%

+32.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

-54.95%

+34.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.12%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-20.23%

+17.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

4.04%

-3.03%

Volatility

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) is 2.08%, while PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that PDBZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBZXPDEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

9.45%

-7.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

19.85%

-16.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

23.62%

-19.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

23.56%

-17.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

22.25%

-16.88%

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PDEZX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDBZX vs. PDEZX - Dividend Comparison

PDBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than PDEZX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
1.64%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBZX and PDEZX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDEZX has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to PDBZX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBZX dropped -20.88% vs PDEZX's -54.95%.

PDEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBZX and PDEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer