PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBZX vs. AAIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBZX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than AAIIX's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBZX has underperformed AAIIX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while AAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.17% annualized return.


PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%

AAIIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.46%
1Y
7.71%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%
AAIIX
Ancora Income Fund
2.39%2.28%9.23%9.46%-14.32%9.21%3.72%11.08%-5.60%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBZX and AAIIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2004

0.24

The correlation between PDBZX and AAIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBZX vs. AAIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AAIIX
AAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBZXAAIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.92

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

6.20

+0.01

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the AAIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBZX and AAIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBZXAAIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.80

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.00

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.00

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.00

+1.09

Drawdowns

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBZX drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum AAIIX drawdown of -98.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBZX and AAIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBZXAAIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-98.01%

+77.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-4.19%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.51%

-98.01%

+92.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.81%

-98.01%

+77.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

-98.01%

+77.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-97.78%

+96.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-12.34%

+10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.30%

-0.29%

Volatility

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX) at 1.15%. This indicates that PDBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBZXAAIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

1.15%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

3.22%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

4.48%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

2,044.45%

-2,038.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

1,445.64%

-1,440.27%

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AAIIX's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDBZX vs. AAIIX - Dividend Comparison

PDBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than AAIIX's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAIIX
Ancora Income Fund
5.20%4.09%4.57%4.77%4.52%4.46%5.68%3.96%4.36%5.69%6.40%6.99%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBZX and AAIIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBZX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to AAIIX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBZX dropped -20.88% vs AAIIX's -98.01%.

AAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBZX and AAIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer