PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBC vs. ROLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
30.72%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-21.50%
ROLG.L
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD
24.00%16.84%4.48%-2.47%16.56%28.06%0.58%5.92%-10.83%
Different Trading Currencies

PDBC is traded in USD, while ROLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ROLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than ROLG.L's 24.00% return.


PDBC

1D
-1.03%
1M
16.09%
YTD
30.72%
6M
33.97%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
9.86%

ROLG.L

1D
0.11%
1M
9.40%
YTD
24.00%
6M
30.38%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
15.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PDBC vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ROLG.L
ROLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBCROLG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

2.08

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

2.68

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.49

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.48

11.12

-3.64

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the ROLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBC and ROLG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBCROLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.08

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.87

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.60

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between PDBC and ROLG.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison

PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, while ROLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.94%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%
ROLG.L
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than ROLG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and ROLG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBCROLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-22.66%

-26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-9.41%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-19.85%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.24%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.53%

-9.14%

-14.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

3.99%

+0.51%

Volatility

PDBC vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) at 5.61%. This indicates that PDBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PDBCROLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

5.61%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

11.83%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

16.06%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

17.82%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.25%

+0.44%