PDBA vs. AVGB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PDBA (Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PDBA returned 3.79% vs 4.63% for AVGB. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. PDBA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AVGB.

Performance

PDBA vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBA achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's 0.71% return.

PDBA

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVGB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBA vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	5.38%	-0.93%
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	0.71%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBA and AVGB is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

PDBA vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBA

PDBA Risk / Return Rank: 13
PDBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
PDBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PDBA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PDBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
PDBA Martin Ratio Rank: 13

AVGB

AVGB Risk / Return Rank: 53
AVGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AVGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AVGB Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AVGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
AVGB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBA vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDBA	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	1.87	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	2.78	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.35	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	2.19	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.92	8.16	-7.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDBA vs. AVGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the AVGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBA and AVGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDBA	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	1.87	-1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	2.02	-1.18

Drawdowns

PDBA vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBA drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBA and AVGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDBA	AVGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.45%	-2.12%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.05%	-2.12%	-5.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.47%	-0.50%	-5.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-0.33%	-3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	0.57%	+3.57%

Volatility

PDBA vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.83%. This indicates that PDBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDBA	AVGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	0.83%	+3.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.51%	1.91%	+4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	2.48%	+8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.29%	2.49%	+10.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.29%	2.49%	+10.80%

PDBA vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDBA vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison

PDBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than AVGB's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	3.46%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.15%	3.32%	13.01%	6.82%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDBA and AVGB in my portfolio?

PDBA and AVGB have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDBA or AVGB?

PDBA has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to AVGB (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBA dropped -12.45% vs AVGB's -2.12%.

Which ETF is better, PDBA or AVGB?

On 1-year performance, AVGB leads with 4.63% vs 3.79% for PDBA. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PDBA or AVGB?

Over the 1-year period, AVGB has performed better with a 4.63% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDBA or AVGB?

AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PDBA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PDBA or AVGB?

AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 3.15% for PDBA.

What is the main difference between PDBA and AVGB?

PDBA is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while AVGB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PDBA and 0.19% for AVGB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.